Baby On The Brain??…

Posted by Jen | cards | Wednesday, March 7, 2007

sweetbabygirl1.JPG
Yep, another one. Another baby card. I did this for today’s sketch challenge and yesterday’s color challenge {great choice of colors, Sharon!!}. The sentiment was done with Karen Foster Snap Stamps…you have these already, right? If not, yes, you NEED them!! I colored over the spots with my Stardust pen {found at Impress}. I’m making this short and sweet since I already posted this morning. Have a wonderful day. We’re having a playdate!

Stamps: Karen Foster Snap Stamps, Polka Dots and Petals, Bundle of Joy
Paper: Regal Rose, Certainly Celery, So Saffron, Chocolate Chip
Ink: So Saffron, Regal Rose, StazOn Black
Etc: Ribbon, eyelets, paper piercing tools

Check It Out…GinaK

Posted by Jen | cards | Wednesday, March 7, 2007

How cute is this little lamb!?! The first time I saw, I knew that it had to be part of my collection. This sweet little guy is just one of many adorable designs by Gina K. Check out her site HERE! She has so many darling designs and sentiments to go along with them. I also want to give her a HUGE **THANK YOU** for her door prize donation! You girls that are going to be at the Arlington Stamp Day will want to get your name in for this one!!!
ginak_boylamb1.JPG

Has anyone noticed that I have been on a baby card kick lately? Nope, I am not expecting, but I must have some crazy baby vibes on the brain. Several of the cards that I made were sent to a friend of mine that is the president of her Mom’s Club in CA. I hope she likes them!
So, a little about this card… the scallop edges were made with my slit punch. I swear, I will never tire of this technique! The panel behind the lamb is stamped with the SU! Paisley background stamp. The main image is mounted on 3d glue dots {3M brand}. The ribbon is either from Wal-Mart or Michael’s and is white on white polka dot. The sentiment is part of the baby sentiment from Small Sayings. BTW~If you missed out on getting that set, you might want to find it someway somehow!! It is so versatile and, IMO…a *perfect* addition to any stamp collection.
Well, that’s all for me, for now at least. I am off to play with baby and hopefully get some stamping in…I love today’s sketch challenge on SCS.

Stamps: Lamb by GinaK, SU!: Paisley, Small Sayings
Paper: Bashful Blue, Certainly Celery, Whisper White
Ink: Bashful Blue, Going Gray, StazOn Black
Etc: Ribbon, 3d Glue Dots by 3M, Slit Punch

Page 71, That’s Me & The Promised Tutorial…

Posted by Jen | Tutorials, projects | Monday, March 5, 2007

Did you see it? I was published in the March 2007 issue of PaperCrafts Magazine {page 71}. This is my very first publication, and lucky for me, it was also a contest so I got lots of goodies! I have to toot my own horn a little just because it was my first time! PS~there are a ton of other names that you will probably recognize in there, too!!
I got a phone call not long after the issue hit newsstands from a woman in Michigan who looked me up on whitepages.com {flattering in a sort of weird way} wanting to know how the card worked. I also got an email from a woman that tracked down this site online and wanted to know what the template was.
I originally learned how to do a Big Buckle card on Splitcoast {HERE is the tutorial on SCS}, but this one is a touch different because of the size. Now, I am going to write a little disclaimer here before I get a flood of comments and/or emails…I want all the SCSers of the world to know that I am not trying to re-write or one-up the tutorial on SCS. I wanted to do this because, #1-I need practice writing tutorials, #2-It’s a little different, so why not. Ok? So be nice, please. ;) {smooches}

SUPPLY LIST:
Card Base: 5”x 8.5”, scored at 5” (shown in Chocolate Chip)
Inside Card Paper: 4.75” square (shown in Pretty In Pink)
Buckle: 1.5”x 4” (shown in Chocolate Chip)
Other paper to layer/stamp
SU! Word Window Punch
SU! Corner Rounder Punch
SU! Round Punches (optional)
Dimensionals (optional)
Embellishments (optional)
Adhesive (I used 3M Tacky Glue)

STEP ONE:
Adhere Buckle {to which I have rounded the corners} to Inside Card Paper.
step1a.jpg

STEP TWO:
Adhere Inside Card Paper to Card Base
step2a.jpg

STEP THREE:
Layer and stamp card front as desired, leaving space for the Word Window Punch.
****Enabler Alert**** {this one is a code red, so read on with caution!}
Doodlebug Design, Inc has “Paper Frills” that I used…they are the cute row of white flowers. They have lots of colors and designs to play with. I found mine at Recollections. These are soooo fun!!
step3a.jpg

STEP FOUR:
Complete finishing details of card, and Viola…a Big Buckle Card.
step4a.jpg

Stamps: Bundle of Joy, Paisley
Paper: Chocolate Chip, Pretty In Pink, Whisper White
Ink: Pretty In Pink, Chocolate Chip, StazOn Black
Other: Punches, Dimensionals, Brads, Ribbon, Blender Pen, Paper Frills

A Case of the Crazies…

Posted by Tony | i{heart}thestamper | Sunday, March 4, 2007

I don’t know how much TV any of you watch. I would say I watch somewhere between plenty and too much. There are a handful of shows we record every week, and Jen and I usually sit down and watch them together. We both love CSI (there is only one CSI as far as I am concerned: the original), My Name is Earl & Scrubs, although this season Scrubs has left us scratching our heads a bit. Jen tends to space out (read: stamp or mess with her website) while I watch 24 or The Unit. When we remember to put it on Deal or No Deal, it usually runs in the background as I scream at the contestants for not making the correct percentage plays, while Jen contemplates the pros and cons of staying married to me.

I decided to give a new show a chance this season, a comedy called Rules of Engagement. It stars Patrick Warburton (eternally known as David Puddy from Seinfeld) among others. I liked the concept and dynamic of the show and its stars respectively, and through 4 episodes it hasn’t been deleted from my recording schedule yet. Hopefully it continues to improve.

(quick sidebar – I’ve learned to be a bit more patient with new shows when I at least like something about them. Go back sometime and watch the first season of Seinfeld, Friends or another show you love; the first few episodes - if not the whole first season - are almost always god-awful.)

In any case, the most recent episode of Rules picked up on a subject that I have long considered noteworthy, but have never seen addressed by any show or comedian. Granted, I don’t watch a whole lot of stand up comedy so more than likely someone has hit on it before.

At the beginning of the show, we have Puddy kicking back watching a Knicks’ game, only to have them lose at the buzzer. As any red-blooded American sports fan knows, if your team loses a heartbreaker, you are within your rights to be completely irrational the rest of the day (bad news for those Saturday morning football games). Shortly thereafter, his wife comes home with some good news about her job. Puddy offers sincere congratulations, but he is clearly distracted. He tries to correct that, but he doesn’t show enough enthusiasm to suit his wife (perhaps cartwheels and confetti would have worked) so naturally a little bickering ensues. It gets really heated when his wife realizes that once again a sports team has affected his mood, as it has regularly since they met.

Like most great men Puddy accepts the blame, realizing the folly of trying to argue his point. His penance: a night on the town.

When the big night arrives, his wife is frantically trying on everything article of clothing in the house looking for the evening’s proper attire. After modeling in front of the mirror in everything but last year’s Halloween costume, she declares herself hopelessly “bloated” and that he might as well go without her. More bickering as Puddy points out that, ironically, he is taking her out to make up for letting sports affect his mood, while she is about to ruin that very occasion due to the reflection in tonight’s mirror directly affecting her mood.

One word from the Guinness Draught scientists: Brilliant!

Every one of you reading (yes, I’m going with the sexism) has secretly despised your husband for letting some stupid sports game affect his mood. How can the outcome of a bunch of overpaid babies (or college kids) playing a child’s game really mean so much? I’m not here to explain why; I’m here to ask that you just accept this as normal and move on with your lives.

The fact is, men the world round long ago learned to live with your crazies, why can’t you just indulge us on a few of our own? We smile and nod when you ask our opinion on bedding for the guest room no one uses. We cringe to ourselves when every pseudo-special event (ie: company parties, a friend’s shower) requires you to purchase a completely new outfit that you will never wear again. Some of us even corral the kids and dogs so you can turn our home into a haven for crafting lunatics (aka: hosting Stamp Camp).

So please, the next time your husband wants to spend 6 hours chasing a little white ball around a golf course, make him a sandwich and say “Hit ‘em well”. Even though you know that next drink means he’ll have a rough time getting up in the morning, make sure you’re okay to drive or call for a cab. Most importantly, when you see his team getting beat, “helpful” comments like “Jeez, they’re really sucking today” are better left unsaid. They may very well be sucking, but your husband is the only one allowed to say it. This is not unlike the rule about kids: you can call your child rotten or spoiled if you want to, but nobody else can. To continue this analogy, his friends are also parents and you are the in-laws: well-meaning but aggravating.

Recovery from a sports loss only happens with time or in consultation with fellow commiserates (long distance phone calls are encouraged). As much as we wish you could help… we know you don’t really care about our team, you only care about us. That probably doesn’t make much sense, but neither does 17 pairs of black shoes.

Td

So Sorry…

Posted by Jen | random ramblings | Saturday, March 3, 2007

Ok, ok…slap me on the wrist. I said that there would be a tutorial today, but with no excuses I will tell you that I don’t have it done yet. I will try to post it later today, or possibly early in the week. Thanks for your understanding! :)

Don’t miss Tony’s rantings tomorrow (I know he already has his done ;) )

« Previous PageNext Page »